Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F.3d 1231

Docket No. 95-7537.

Chambers v. Sutton

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996. Decided: Jan. 24, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Gholson v. Rice Umt Ce Tac Tac

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-24

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

/74/f3d/1231 · .json · Public domain