Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F.3d 1235

Docket No. 95-7248.

Williams v. Epperson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 14, 1995. Decided: January 17, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-17

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Calvin Scott Wedington

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-17

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven Charles Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Epperson, No. CA-95-42 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/74/f3d/1235 · .json · Public domain