Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F.3d 1235

Docket No. 95-7459.

Woods v. State

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2015

1 state decisions

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Calvin Scott Wedington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stanley Eugene Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina; Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-3283-3-3BC (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/74/f3d/1235 · .json · Public domain