United States v. Winstead’s Empirical Analysis
74 F.3d 1313 · 1996
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc. (2009), United States v. Godwin (2001)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Gaudin · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the goal of deterring violations of the Court Reporter Act; (2) the ability (and reasonable efforts of the parties) to correct for violations of the Act by reconstructing the record; and (3) the likelihood that reversible error occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is beyond doubt that the members of the jury would have reached the same conclusion had they explicitly considered materiality as part of their deliberations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the court is to determine: '(1) whether there is unwaived legal error, (2) whether the error is "plain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.