Macintyre Apc v. C Macintyre M’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Cairns Lvo Fca Jp Mbe v. Franklin Mint Company (2002), In Re: Thomas Banks (2001)
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax Commission · Bernard v. Coyne · Steelcase Inc. v. Johnston · 28 Cal. App. 4th 8 - Yaesu Electronics Corp. v. Tamura
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) As used in this section, “private retirement plan” means: (1) Private retirement plans, including, but not limited to, union retirement plans. (2) Profit-sharing plans designed and used for retirement purposes. (3) Self-employed retirement plans and individual retirement annuities or accounts provided for in the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended, to the extent the amounts held in the plans, annuities, or accounts do not exceed the maximum amounts exempt from federal income taxation under that code. (b) All amounts held, controlled, or in process of distribution by a private retirement plan, for the payment of benefits as an annuity, pension, retirement allowance, disability payment, or death benefit from a private retirement plan are exempt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“only to the extent necessary to provide for the support of the judgment debtor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re: Max R. Moses Marlene E. Moses, Debtors. Howard Ehrenberg, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, in Re: Max R. Moses Marlene E. Moses, Debtors. Southern California Permanente Medical Group v. Howard Ehrenberg, Chapter 7 Trustee · Simpson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)“CCP § 704.115 'is perfectly clear, so resort to legislative history is neither called for nor appropriate.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.