Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.3d 210 - Beville v. Ednie

Beville v. Ednie’s Empirical Analysis

74 F.3d 210 · 1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2010

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Bounds v. Smith · Procunier v. Martinez · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Thornburgh v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Recently, we held where a prisoner's access to a law library and alternative legal resources was denied for eighteen days, his right to access to the courts was not violated because the denial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Nevertheless, we have indicated that the length of incarceration without access to legal materials may affect[ ] whether a prisoner's rights were violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there may be cases where a prisoner is denied access for such a short time that prejudice would have to be shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.