Rogal Dds’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2020
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · United States v. Dunnigan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Like other sanctions, attorney's fees certainly should not be assessed lightly or without fair notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re: Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation. Esso Standard Oil S.A. Ltd. Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. Esso Standard Oil Co. (Puerto Rico), in No. 96-7385, Goldman, Antonetti & Cordova Francis Torres, Esquire Jose Cepeda, Esquire, in No. 96-7386, Eugenio C. Romero, an Attorney at Law, in No. 96-7387, L'henri, Inc., in No. 96-7388, Rhoda Harthman Charlotte A. Labarre Albert E. Harthman Arthur E. Harthman Austin E. Harthman Edgar A. Harthman Sammy E. Harthman P.I.D., Inc. Tutu Services, Limited, in No. 96-7389, Ramsay Motors, Inc., in No. 96-7390, Texaco Inc. Texaco Caribbean, Inc. Vernon Morgan, in No. 96-7391, Four Winds Plaza Partnership, in No. 96-7392 · Prosser v. Prosser“based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 98-1327
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.