Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.3d 57 - Glover v. Ampak, Inc.

Glover v. Ampak, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

74 F.3d 57 · 1996

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Retail Services Inc. v. Freebies Publishing (2004), Ale House Management Incorporated v. Raleigh Ale House Incorporated John a Duranko (2000)

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

1501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (§ 7 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1064 (§ 14 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1119 (§ 37 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · Pizzeria Uno Corp. v. Temple · Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc., and Allied Chemical Corporation, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., and N.W. Ayer & Son, Incorporated D/B/A N.W. Ayer Abh International · King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Aladdin Industries, Inc. · Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) identify the class of product or service to which use of the mark is relevant; (2) identify the relevant purchasing public of the class of product or service; and (3) prove that the primary significance of the mark to the relevant public is to identify the class of product or service to which the mark relates.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the primary significance of the mark [is] its indication of the nature or class of the product or service, rather than an indication of source.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purchaser testimony, consumer surveys, listings and dictionaries, trade journals, newspapers, and other publications.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.