Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.3d 68 - Artuso v. Hall

Artuso v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

74 F.3d 68 · 1996

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Evans v. United States Parole Commission (1996), Fowler v. United States Parole Commission (1996)

25 federal appellate · 5 district ·

350199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Joseph v. United States · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Grynberg v. Danzig · United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A special parole term ... may be revoked if its terms and conditions are violated. In such circumstances the original term of imprisonment shall be increased by the period of the special parole term and the resulting new term of imprisonment shall not be diminished by the time which was spent on special parole. A person whose special parole term has been revoked may be required to serve all or part of the remainder of the new term of imprisonment. A special parole term ... shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other parole provided for by law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when the [Commission] cancels or rescinds a term of special parole, nothing in former section 841(c) provides it with additional authority to impose a second term.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.