Production Supply Co. v. Fry Steel Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
74 F.3d 76 · 1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2021
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc. · 13 Cal. 3d 43 - Bertero v. National General Corp. · 47 Cal. 3d 863 - Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker · 8 Cal. 4th 666 - Crowley v. Katleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A federal court asked to give res judicata effect to a state court judgment must apply the res judicata principles of the law of the state whose decision is set up as a bar to further litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.