Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.3d 768 - Iae Incorporated v. D Shaver

Iae Incorporated v. D Shaver’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Edwin Kennedy v. National Juvenile Detention Association and Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission (1999), Keane Dealer Services, Inc. v. Harts (1997)

1 federal appellate · 20 district · 1 state decisions

5401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Watson v. United States · Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a person (the licensee) requests the creation of a work, (2) the creator (the licensor) makes the particular work and delivers it to the licensee who requested it, and (3) the licensor intends that the licensee-requestor copy and distribute his work.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A nonexclusive license is, therefore, an exception to the writing requirement of section 204. In fact, consent given in the form of mere permission or lack of objection is also equivalent to a nonexclusive license and is not required to be in writing. Although a person holding a nonexclusive license has no standing to sue for copyright infringement, the existence of a license, exclusive or nonexclusive, creates an affirmative defense to a claim of copyright infringement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n the case of an implied nonexclusive license, the licensor-creator of the work, by granting an implied nonexclusive license, does not transfer ownership of the copyright to the licensee. The copyright owner simply permits the use of a copyrighted work in a particular manner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.