United States v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
74 F.3d 819 · 1996
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Buehl v. Vaughn (1999), United States v. Salerno (1997)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Lockhart v. Fretwell · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Duarte · United States v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On review, a district court's sentencing decisions will be 'upheld so long as the Guidelines were correctly applied to findings of fact that were not clearly erroneous.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“all reasonably foreseeable acts ... of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the evidence (1) is directed toward establishing a matter in issue other than the defendant's propensity to commit the crime charged, (2) shows that the other act is similar enough and close enough in time to be relevant to the matter in issue, (3) is sufficient to support a jury finding that the defendant committed the similar act, and (4) has probative value which is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.