Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.3d 829 - Smith v. Cook County

Smith v. Cook County’s Empirical Analysis

74 F.3d 829 · 1996

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
February 2006
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Liegl v. Webb · Dennis v. United States · Montana v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since we have conducted a de novo review of the motion for summary judgment we need not tarry long over these objections.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must raise some doubt as to the genuineness of the given reasons for a termination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]dding together a string of nothings still yields nothing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.