Gomez v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
74 F.3d 967 · 1996
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Molina v. Astrue (2012), Andrews v. King (2005)
12 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Magallanes v. Bowen · Andrews v. Shalala · Gallant v. Heckler · Flaten v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Ramirez v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Appeals Council affirmed the decision of the ALJ [terminating plaintiff's] benefits..., [the additional] evidence is part of the record on review to this court.” Gomez v. Chater, 74 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 881 , 117 S.Ct. 209 , 136 L.Ed.2d 144 (1996); Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir.2000). 5 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the report of an interdisciplinary team that contains the evaluation and signature of an acceptable medical source is also considered acceptable medical evidence.”) 22 . See Walters, 127 F.3d at 530 ; Diaz, 59 F.3d at 314 ; see also Cronkhite v. Sullivan, 935 F.2d 133, 134 (8th Cir.1991) (holding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was based on limitations which the ALJ had properly rejected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.