Resnick v. Chubb Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on The Medical Protective Company v. William Watkins · Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. Raymer · Green v. America Online · Coleman Company Inc v. California Union Insurance Company Avreco Inc · 189 F. Supp. 2d 1212 - Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“drops down” to provide primary coverage if the primary policy does not provide a duty to defend. UO MSJ at 13, 14. See also Resnick v. Chubb Corp., 74 Fed.Appx. 216, 220-21 (3d Cir.2003) ("[A]n umbrella policy generally provides two types of coverage: excess coverage and, when broader than the underlying policy, primary coverage. An umbrella policy provides standard excess insurance coverage that applies after a predetermined amount of primary coverage is exhausted. Additionally, an umbrella policy can provide broader coverage than the underlying policy, meaning that the umbrella policy will "drop down” to provide primary coverage.”) (Internal citation omitted). . Policy 714-00-72-70-002. JA, Ex. 4 (the “2008-2009 Policy”). . Policy 714-00-72-70-003. JA, Ex. 5 (the "2009-2010 Policy”). . Policy 710-02-98-44-000, JA, Ex. 6 (the “2010-2011 Policy”). . Policy RHY 9200550-00, JA, Ex. 7 (the "2011-2012 Policy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.