Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F. App'x 271

United States v. Haley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-09-10

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2004

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-09-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Arthur Allen Haley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Haley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/74/fappx/271 · .json · Public domain