Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 FLA 594 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1968

9 state decisions

50191719201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lewis v. State · People v. Wasservogle · Strobhar v. State · State v. . Whedbee · Commonwealth v. Beckett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not necessary that the false representations be entirely by spoken or written words. Acts and conduct in connection with the same, or even acts and conduct alone under certain circumstances, may be as potent to establish false representations as when made by word of mouth.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.