Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F. Supp. 2d 310 - United States v. Doe

74 F. Supp. 2d 310 - United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Breed v. Jones · Moskal v. United States · Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. American Train Dispatchers Association Csx Transportation Inc · United States v. Doe · In re Sealed Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant is charged with a host of serious crimes, including murder and other acts of violence, that arise out of his alleged involvement with a criminal organization. The nature of these crimes, and the fact that defendant has already been convicted of robbery, heightens the court’s concerns about the threat to society posed by juvenile crime. Of paramount concern to the court is [Gonzalez’s] demonstrated tendency to revert to criminal behavior. While defendant emphasizes that he was under the influence of [co-defendant] Juan Ramirez, there is evidence that he committed crimes on his own. accord. The primary example is his participation in a drug smuggling and distribution operation at Riker’s Island during his incarceration for his robbery conviction.... As rehabilitation is a primary purpose of the federal .delinquency provisions, including § 5032, and the government has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that rehabilitation is not likely in this case, the court finds that transfer of [Gonzalez] to adult status is warranted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Second Circuit has given its implicit support to the notion that a juvenile's previous arrests may be relevant to the prior juvenile record’ factor”). But see In re Sealed Case, 893 F.2d 363 , 369 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.1990) (stating that a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “demonstrated tendency to revert to criminal behavior”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.