74 F. Supp. 2d 521 - Bissell v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen an employer knows about racial harassment between co-employees it will be found liable for it unless it can show that it took “prompt and adequate remedial action.” ... The remedial actions should be “reasonably calculated to end the harassment.” ... “The adequacy of [the defendant’s] remedy is a question of fact which a court may not dispose of at the summary judgment stage if reasonable minds could differ as to whether the remedial action was reasonably calculated to end the harassment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must establish that 'an accommodation was needed’ in order to carry out the essential functions of the position.” Dage v. Leavitt, 2007 WL 81961 , at -8 (D.D.C. Jan. 9, 2007) (quoting Bissell v. Reno, 74 F.Supp.2d 521, 528 (D.Md.1999)); see also Gaines v. Runyon, 107 F.3d 1171, 1175 (6th Cir.1997) (affirming the grant of summary judgment because the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.