74 F. Supp. 2d 824 - Perry v. Delaney’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 501 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 558 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 566 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action. The reviewing court shall— (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be— (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege or immunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.