Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 Ind. 560

Derry v. Derry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1881-05-15

<p>Marriage. — Valuable Consideration. — Contract.—Married Woman. — Marriage is a valuable consideration, and a married woman is regarded as a purchaser for a valuable consideration of all property which accrues toiler by virtue of the marriage or any valid antenuptial agreement.</p> <p>Trusts. — Lands Bought by Wife. — ILusband as Trustee. — Purchaser for Valuable Consideration Without Notice. — Where a wife bought land and paid for it with money of her own separate estate, and, either by agreement at the time, or without her knowledge or. consent, it was conveyed toller husband, and held by him, and she made lasting and valuable improvements on it, and paid for them with her separate money, the husband held the land as trustee for her; but such trust could not defeat the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration and without notice of the trust.</p> <p>Same. — Second Wife. — Title by Descent. — Where, in such case, the husband' survives the wife, and marries again, holding such trust land, his second wife, on his death intestate, takes by descent, and not by purchase, and is bound by such trust, whether she had notice of it or not.</p> <p>Same. — Widow.—Descent.—Under our statutes, where a wife takes an interest in the lands of her deceased husband by descent, she is not within section 2 of the statute, 1 R. S. 1876, p. 915, which declares that no trust concerning lands shall defeat the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, without notice of the trust.</p> <p>Same. — Second Wife. — Survivorship.—Child of Marriage. — Survivorship and a child of the marriage are required to entitle a second wife to a fee simple in the lands of her husband.</p> <p>Partition. — Answer.—Demurrer.—In an action by a second wife for partition of land of her deceased husband, answers by the children and grandchildren of the deceased and his first wife, that she bought and paid for the land, and that her husband held it in trust for her, are sufficient on demurrer.</p> <p>Same. — Widow’s Mights. — The law in force at the death of the husband is the measure of the widow’s rights.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1881-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1976

14 state decisions

501881189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Petition for a Rehearing.

Bicknell, C.

¶2Under the statutes of Indiana, the interest .of a wife in the lands of her deceased husband is in some cases held by purchase, and in other cases by descent.

¶3Where she takes by descent, she is not within the statute, which declares that no trust shall defeat the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, without notice. In the present case the second wife could take by descent only; she was, therefore, bound by the trust in favor of the first wife, whether she had notice of it or not. The question is between the second wife and the representatives of a first wife. '“In equal equities the law must prevail.” The petition for ;a rehearing ought to be overruled.

¶4Per Curiam. — Petition overruled.

/74/ind/560 · .json · Public domain