Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 INDAPP 314 - Flick v. Jordan

Flick v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allemong v. Simmons · Hougland v. State ex rel. McCool · Taylor v. Reger · Wright v. Floyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We can see no purpose in having the directors of the company join in the indorsement in the manner in which they did; for, if they only indorsed in a representative capacity, they added nothing whatever to the indorsement of the note, it being sufficiently indorsed to bind the company by its president. * * * The corporate signature was complete without the signature of any director./’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.