Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1952
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jarrell v. Brubaker · Warrick v. Spry · Bohr v. Neuenschwander · Brehm v. Hennings · Carr v. Carr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule is that, if the judgment gives the party obtaining the same greater or less relief than he is entitled to under the verdict or finding, the remedy is by motion to modify the judgment. Jarrell v. Brubaker (1898), 150 Ind. 260 , 49 N.E. 1050 ; Warrick v. Spry (1912), 49 Ind. App. 327 , 97 N.E. 361 . ’ ’ Moore v. Moore (1921), 74 Ind. App. 626, 630 , 129 N.E. 480 . See also Sahm v. State ex rel (1909), 172 Ind. 237 , 88 N.E. 257 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.