Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 KAN 296 - Hampe v. Higgins

Hampe v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1973
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1973

6 state decisions

3019061910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 32 N.J. Eq. 233 - Van Syckel v. Dalrymple

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our view the evidence furnished by the face of the two instruments and also the extrinsic circumstances shown indicate that the parties intended the deed as a complete settlement of all further controversy concerning the sale and conveyance of the land. The transaction was initiated by the contract of sale and closed with the deed.” (Page 298.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.