Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 KAN 700 - Madison v. Clippinger

Madison v. Clippinger’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1920
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1920

8 state decisions

40190619101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Daniels · Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Gulf Rld. v. McHenry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the violation of a duty expressly imposed by a statute upon an owner or operator of machinery dangerous to employees or to the public is negligence which prima facie imposes liability for damages resulting therefrom is well-settled law.” (p. 703.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.