Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 KAN 715 - Mirick v. Suchy

Mirick v. Suchy’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
September 1975
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1975

14 state decisions

7019061910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. M. K. & T. Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The act must be the result of doing the business of the master or parent, and not of an independent act done during a cessation, even momentary, of the doing of such business.” (Mirick v. Suchy, 74 Kan. 715, 718 , 87 Pac. 1141 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.