¶1This is an appeal from a conviction and judgment fining the appellant $50. The state moves to dismiss, and assigns various reasons, none of which is considered sufficient. The bill of exceptions does not disclose the commission of any error prejudicial to the appellant, therefore the judgment is affirmed.
74 Kan. 899
State v. Caton
Decided December 8, 1906
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1906-12-08
<p>Appeal from Anderson district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.</p>
Affirmed · Decided 1906-12-08