Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 MICH 374 - Cooper v. Mulder

Cooper v. Mulder’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1938
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1938

4 state decisions

20188918901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One cannot be permitted to sit by and see another constantly using his name in the purchase of goods, receive the invoices showing the purchase in his name, give orders for the goods to be taken from the depot and express-office, see the other dealing them off as his own, and then, when called upon for payment by one who has been acting in good, faith, repudiate the whole transaction, and deny the agency.” Cooper v. Mulder, 74 Mich. 374, 385 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.