Johnson v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis
1898
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1947
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But tbis rule of ‘process fair on its face’ is one of protection merely, and-personal to tlie officer himself, and affords him no shelter when he is the moving party in causing it to be wrongfully issued solely for his own benefit and where he knows the judgment upon which it is issued to have been paid and satisfied,” Johnson v. Randall, 74 Minn. 44 , 47, 76 N. W. 791 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.