¶1 The defendant’s appeal rests upon the'idea that there is a variance between the judgment rendered by the magistrate and the one docketed in the office of the Superior Court Clerk, when, in fact, though expressed in words somewhat different, they mean precisely the same thing. The defendant contends that the Justice’s judgment implies interest at six per cent. only. But of course his judgment, giving *257 “interest from 10th day of April, 1874,” upon a note which, specified on its face that it should bear interest, at eight per •cent. pur annum, could mean nothing else than interest at eight per cent; and when the Clerk, in docketing the Justice’s judgment, which was taken by confession, according to specialty filed, added the words “at eight per cent.” he did not,, in the least degree, change the sense or the legal effect of the Justice’s judgment.
¶2 The judgment of the Superior Ccmt is iffirmed.
¶3 There are four other otes lchutn tl t tin e parties, and involvirg the tin e part, l<fot vs tt tl is tom. Let judgment be cutocd in all in ttriem ity to tl is pinion.
¶4 Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.