Woodson v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1983
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rehn v. Bingaman · Woodson v. Lee · State Bank v. Mackley · Curry v. CONSTRUCTION & GENERAL LABORERS UNION LOCAL NO. 438, AFL-CIO.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although no time within which a mandate may be recalled is prescribed by our rules, it would seem fairly certain that upon mandate having been issued by us and action having been taken thereon in the district court, jurisdiction of this court would be at an end.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hayes v. Reeves““Under our practice, a civil case is considered to be finally disposed of and the mandate issues when time for filing a motion for rehearing has expired without a motion being filed or if a motion is filed, when the same is denied. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bobrick v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.