Frederick v. Younger Van Lines’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
82 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Blauwkamp v. University of New Mexico Hospital (1992), Samora v. Bradford (1970)
82 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Medler v. Henry · Montano v. Saavedra · Morris v. Cartwright · Brown v. Cobb · Souza's Case
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * We think it clear, howéver, ■ that evidence which is unimpeached, and uncontradicted, either by direct testimony, suspicious circumstances, or adverse inferences may not be unceremoniously cast aside and disregarded, and findings diametrically opposed thereto lack support * ;|c * a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““. . . To obtain a review under Rule 17(2) no notice of cross-appeal is required, but merely the making of a point in the appellee’s brief of the claimed error together with arguments thereon.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Adams v. Thompson · Aitken v. Starr“[TJhe testimony of a witness, whether interested or disinterested, cannot arbitrarily be disregarded by the trier of the facts * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lahr v. Lahr · Corley v. Corley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.