Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 N.M. 587 - Baker v. Sojka

Baker v. Sojka’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 1999 · most notably Govich v. North American Systems, Inc. (1991), Lujan v. Gonzales (1972)

32 state decisions

1201964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Epperson · City of Roswell v. Holmes · Pettine v. Rogers · Geraldine Nolan v. James E. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * even though the notice of appeal is deficient, if it is apparent therefrom that it is the intention of the appellant to appeal and if the appellee has not been misled, the notice of appeal will be sustained."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the instant case, the intent of the plaintiff is plain from the notice that she wished to take an appeal, and in view of the fact that there was only the one order by the trial court, the defendant could not have been misled by the defect. . . . there was only the one order from which an appeal could be taken. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the summary judgment. The notice of appeal mentioned only the judgment, based upon which the appellees assert a failure of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 5(5) [§ 21-2-1(5)(5) N.M.S.A., 1953] which provides that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.