Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 NW2D 440 - Hoth v. Kahler

Hoth v. Kahler’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2021

1 district · 6 state decisions

3019561960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co. · Skinner v. Stone · Petre v. Slowinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Any kind of document or documents, taken singly or together, may constitute the required memorandum, if the terms of the contract are sufficiently stated therein.’ If these documents ‘show who are the contracting parties, intelligently identify the subject matter involved, express the consideration, and disclose the terms and conditions upon which the contract is entered into,’ then the memorandum is sufficient.” Goetz v. Hubbell, supra, 266 N.W. at page 838 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.