74 Ohio App. 3d 162 - State v. Moon’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2020
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · Beck v. State of Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Roviaro v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a criminal defendant enjoys the right-as embodied in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution — to offer testimony of witnesses on his behalf.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by means of a proffer or otherwise, that [the witnesses] could add anything to the proceedings that the other defense witnesses were unable to supply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the orderly administration of justice is threatened by the accused's failure to promptly disclose witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.