74 Ohio App. 3d 468 - State v. Folk’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 151 Ohio App. 3d 498 - Big Bob's, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission (2003), 686 So. 2d 368 - Ex Parte Oswalt (1996)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bridgeman · State v. George · People v. Glen · 12 Cal. App. 3d 575 - Alvidres v. Superior Court · United States v. Lowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that at some future time, but not presently, certain evidence of crime will be located at a specific place to be searched,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The speed with which law enforcement is often required to act, especially when dealing with the furtive and transitory activities of persons who traffic in narcotics, demands that the courts make every effort to assist law enforcement in complying with the edicts that the courts themselves have issued. We must ask ourselves whether the objective of the rule is better served by permitting officers under circumstances similar to the case at bar to obtain a warrant in advance of the delivery of the narcotic or by forcing them to go to the scene without a warrant and there make a decision at the risk of being second-guessed by the judiciary if they are successful in recovering evidence or contraband. We believe that achievement of the goals which our high court had in mind in adopting the exclusionary evidence rule is best attained by permitting officers to seek warrants in advance when they can clearly demonstrate that their right to search will exist within a reasonable time in the future.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Womack“[P]arties are bound as to all matters of fact and law concerned in their stipulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.