74 Ohio App. 3d 62 - State v. Mintz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Madden, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2005) · State v. Rutkowski, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2006)

2. “The essence of the constitutional guarantee is that the trial may not be unjustifiably delayed.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rutkowski, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2006) · State v. Parker, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2004)

3. “"(B) An accused who enters a diversion program shall: "(1) Waive, in writing and contingent upon his successful completion of the program, the accused's right to a speedy trial * * * "* * * "(D) * * * If the accused chooses not to enter the prosecuting attorney's diversion program, or if the accused violates the conditions of the agreement pursuant to which the accused has been released, the accused may be brought to trial upon the charges in the manner provided by law, and the waiver executed pursuant to division (B)(1) of this section shall be void on the date the accused is removed from the program for the violation."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Barnes, 90847 (10-23-2008)