State v. Taniguchi’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 120 Ohio App. 3d 247 - State v. Hiatt (1997), 112 Ohio App. 3d 100 - State v. Wemer (1996)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arnold v. City of Cleveland · Bernardini v. Board of Education · State v. Waddell · Mosher v. City of Dayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is basic hornbook law that the state under its police powers may impose restrictions on who may possess firearms.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A court should give effect to the words actually employed in a statute, and should not delete words used, or insert words not used, in the guise of interpreting the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lingle v. State“when there is an acquittal on, or dismissal of, the indictment which had formed the basis for the charge of having a weapon while under disability,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.