Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 Ohio St. 3d 236

State v. Way

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1996-01-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1996

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Under App.R. 26(B)(2)(b), an application for reopening requires “[a] showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment[.]” Here, the appellate judgments were journalized on June 28, 1989 and January 10, 1990, and the appellant filed his appeal on February 22, 1995, over five years later. Nowhere in the record does appellant offer any good cause for his untimely filing. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
/74/ohiost3d/236 · .json · Public domain