74 Ohio St. 3d 277
Decided January 10, 1996
Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1996-01-10
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-01-10
Cited by 170 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Gumm (2004), State v. LaMar (2004)
3 federal appellate · 165 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.
¶2Judgment affirmed.