Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 Ohio St. 3d 410

State v. Higgins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1996

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1996-01-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1996

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Having examined the same portions of the record as the court of appeals, we come to the same conclusion. The trial court advised appellant of the maximum term of incarceration, as required by Crim.R. 11(C)(2), and appellant and her counsel executed the entry of waiver and plea, which stated the period of actual incarceration. Accordingly, there is no genuine issue indicating ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
/74/ohiost3d/410 · .json · Public domain