State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2017
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gibbons v. Ogden · Lake County v. Rollins · Willis v. Mabon · United States v. Haynes · Tuttle v. National Bank of the Republic of St. Louis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The recall petition shall be filed with the officer with whom a petition for nomination to such office should he filed, and the same officer shall order the special election when it is required(italics ours),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Wilson“[e]very public officer in Oregon is subject, as herein provided, to recall”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.