Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 P.3d 111

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel · decided 2003-08-06

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2018

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2008-5

¶2T1 QUESTION 1; May a municipal judge retain that office after the judge's spouse is elected to the city council?

¶3T2 QUESTION 2: If, in the future, the spouse becomes Mayor with the right to appoint the municipal judge, must the judge resign?

¶4T3 FACT SITUATION:

1. The judge seeking an opinion has been a municipal judge in a rural community since 1996. The term of office is two years and the appointment is made by the May- or.
2. The judge was last reappointed in 2002. Since that appointment, the judge's spouse has become a member of the city council.

¶5T4 Canon 2: "A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all of the Judge's Activities.

(A) A judge should respect and comply with the law at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

¶615 WE ANSWER:

Question 1: Yes
Question 2: No, but may not be re-appointed by spouse.

¶7DISCUSSION:

¶8T6 The answer to these questions involve not only Canon 2 and the appearance of impropriety, but also the provision of 11 0.8. § 8-106 dealing with the subject of nepotism and Canon 2A as it requires a judge to comply with the law at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

¶9T7 Title 11 0.8. § 8-106 provides, "No elected or appointed official or other authority of the municipal government shall appoint or elect any person related by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree to any . office or position of profit in the municipal government. The provisions of this seetion shall not prohibit an officer or employee already in the service of the municipality from continuing in such service or from promotion therein."

¶10T8 It is not our function to construe statutes but it appears that the statute in question is so clear and unambiguous as applied to the fact situation that no interpretation is necessary and our answers comply with the provisions of Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

¶11T9 ROBERT L. BAILEY, Chairman, ROBERT D. SIMMS, Vice Chairman, MILTON C. CRAIG, Secretary.

/74/p3d/111 · .json · Public domain