Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 SD 126 - Doyen v. Lamb

Doyen v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1997

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

4019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Granflaten v. Rohde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The lawfulness of the speed of a motor vehicle is not determined by a particular rate of speed. The lawfulness of the speed of a motor vehicle within the prima facie limits fixed by [SDCL 32-25-3] is determined by the further test of whether the speed is “greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.” A speed which would be safe and reasonable in some places and under some circumstances might be highly dangerous and unreasonable in other places.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.