Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 SO2D 108 - Schwartz v. Zaconick

Schwartz v. Zaconick’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1988

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

601954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 So. 2d 173 - Schwartz v. Zaconick · Wilhelm v. Adams · Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... The general rule is that costs follow the results of the litigation but in equity this rule may be departed from according to the circumstances. Wilhelm v. Adams, 102 Fla. 669 , 136 So. 397 ; Holly Hill Grove & Fruit Co. v. Wicker, 107 Fla. 765 , 143 So. 882 ..."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.