¶1 In this direct appeal from his judgment and sentences, Joshua Mitchell challenges the imposition of sex offender probation *161 and his designation as a sexual predator. We affirm the judgment and sentences. However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Mr. Mitchell’s right to file a timely, facially sufficient motion in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 3.850. See Nedd v. State, 855 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA2008).
¶2 Affirmed.