74 So. 3d 353 - Glidden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 249 So. 2d 414 - Curry v. State · 912 So. 2d 919 - Tate v. State · 506 So. 2d 254 - Boches v. State · 749 So. 2d 983 - Sullivan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Glidden had been driving the truck for approximately thirty minutes with a large bag of marijuana directly under his feet. According to the testimony of both Detective Compston and Sergeant Goodman, the clear plastic bag was on the driver's side floorboard and was immediately visible through the truck window. Glidden admitted that the truck was small and that a bag that large would have been easily seen by him. From the evidence presented, reasonable jurors could have concluded that Glidden was guilty of possession of a controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sufficient facts to warrant a finding that the defendant was aware of the presence and character of the particular [item] and was intentionally and consciously in possession of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.