West Texas Const. Co. v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1982
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Michael v. Crawford · Emory v. Bailey · Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co. · Holmes v. Coryell · 9 Tex. Civ. App. 261 - Luzenberg v. Bexar Building & Loan Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any new trustee or substitute appointed hereunder shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to the grantors an instrument accepting such appointment hereunder, which said instrument shall be duly recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Dallas, Texas, and thereupon such new trustee, or substitute, shall become invested with identically the same title to said premises, and the same rights and powers, subject to the same duties as the trustee hereunder. o”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.