Jaubert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “indicates that the primary purpose of the statutory amendment was to clarify, after this Court's decision to the contrary in Grunsfeld [ v. State, 843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Crim.App.1992) ], that evidence of unadjudicated extraneous offenses and prior bad acts is admissible at punishment. The notice provision was designed to reinforce existing law regarding notice of extraneous offenses, not to create a new and different requirement.... At the time the statute was amended, Rule 404(b) described the existing law regarding notice of extraneous offenses. [15]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Worthy v. State

2. “We recognize that section 3(g) also states that notice is given, “in the same manner required by Rule 404(b), Texas Rules of ... Evidence.” Id. (emphasis added). Manner is defined as “a way, mode, method of doing anything, or mode of proceeding in any case or situation.” Black’s Law DictionaRy 963 (6th ed.1990). Consequently, this portion relates only to the procedure governing a defendant’s request and the State’s response to that request, and not to the scope of the information to which the section applies.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Waltmon v. State

3. “provided that upon timely request by the accused in a criminal case, reasonable notice is given in advance of trial of intent to introduce in the State's case-in-chief such evidence other than that arising in the same transaction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Worthy v. State