Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 S.W.3d 738 - Combs v. Commonwealth

Combs v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Alford v. United States · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has recognized that “neither the prosecution nor the defense may call a witness knowing that the witness will assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination,” and we have applied this black-letter law in cases where a witness invokes the privilege in order to avoid answering any substantive questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “trial judge may or even must limit the government's cross-examination on collateral matters if this can be done without unduly limiting the government and if doing so will preserve the defendant's ability to call a material witness who would otherwise claim the privilege.[”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.